case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
Blog Article
case legislation Case legislation is regulation that is based on judicial decisions rather than regulation based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case regulation concerns one of a kind disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of the case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common law , refers back to the collection of precedents and authority established by previous judicial decisions on the particular issue or subject.
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It can be very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Today educational writers are often cited in legal argument and decisions as persuasive authority; normally, they are cited when judges are attempting to carry out reasoning that other courts have not however adopted, or when the judge believes the educational's restatement with the legislation is more powerful than is often found in case regulation. Consequently common regulation systems are adopting one of many strategies very long-held in civil law jurisdictions.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner must go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this kind of an appeal hasn't nonetheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then search for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Because the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be arrived at, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support in the Supreme Court, making certain the enforcement of its judgments. Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be arrived at, the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. Read more
When you find an error during the content material of a published opinion (like a misspelled name or even a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue steering with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The existence of this power casts an obligation on the police, plus they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its many pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are required to protect and never abduct. Read more
Any court could search for to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
Generally, only an appeal accepted because of the court of past vacation resort will resolve these differences and, For lots of reasons, such appeals are frequently not granted.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is click here additionally a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.